Creating an excellent digital picture frame ought to be simple. All that’s required is a quality screen and an easy way to transfer your favorite photos to the device. Combine this with an attractive, frame-like design, and you’re all set.
However, many digital photo frames are disappointing. Amazon is overflowing with numerous digital frames, reminiscent of the knock-off iPods from the 2000s. Numerous inexpensive options are available that ultimately provide a lackluster experience, one that encourages you to stow the device away in a drawer and forget about it.
The encouraging news is that you only need to discover one smart photo frame that performs well. From there, you can enjoy a thoroughly pleasant experience. If you’re like me, you have thousands of phone photos of friends, family, pets, vacation spots, perhaps even some lattes or plates of pasta, and much more. Too often, those photos remain trapped on our phones, not shared with others or appreciated on a larger scale. Although I can view my photos on my laptop or an iPad, there’s just something satisfying about having a dedicated place for them. After all, photo frames exist for a reason, right? An excellent frame allows you to send photos to loved ones and share treasured memories with friends and family effortlessly. I tested seven smart photo frames to sift through the junk and find the best digital frames worth buying.
What to Look For in Digital Picture Frames
While a digital photo frame might seem to be a simple tech device, I considered several factors when deciding on a frame worthy of display in my home. Foremost among these was screen resolution and size. I was surprised to learn that most digital photo frames are around 1,200 x 800 in resolution, which feels pixelated. (This applies to frames in the nine- to ten-inch size range, which was my focus for this guide.)
After testing multiple frames, I realized that screen resolution isn’t the top priority; my favorite photos appeared best on frames that excelled in reflectivity, brightness, viewing angles, and color temperature. Many digital photo frames fell short in these areas; they did not handle reflections well or featured poor viewing angles.
Many frames I evaluated felt cheaply made and unattractive – not ideal for a smart device intended to be displayed in your home. This includes poor stands, overly glossy plastic components, and strange design choices, especially for items meant to blend into your home. The best digital photo frames don’t draw attention to themselves and resemble an actual “dumb” frame, blending in so well that those who are less tech-savvy might mistake them for a traditional one.
Besides the display, perhaps the most crucial factor is the software. I must be candid: several frames I tried had utterly dreadful companion apps and software experiences that I wouldn’t recommend to anyone. One frame lacked a touchscreen, but featured an IR remote (similar to those used with TVs decades ago). Attempting to use it over Wi-Fi was frustrating, and scanning a QR code led me to a random Google search instead of an app or website. I discarded the $140 PixStar frame immediately.
Other issues were more forgivable. Many frames resemble Android tablets with some custom software added on top, functioning adequately but not with much elegance. Interacting with the photo frame using touch was not ideal because it left fingerprints all over the display. The best frames I tested were smart about which features could be controlled on the frame itself or through an app, with the latter being my preference.
A crucial note about the software: many frames demanded subscriptions for features that should have been included from the start. For instance, one frame only allowed me to upload 10 photos at a time without a subscription. Others let you connect a Google Photos account, but restricted album syncing without a paid plan. One particular option didn’t allow album creation to organize photos on the frame, resulting in a disordered scroll of photos without any way to categorize them.
While premium frames offer benefits like unlimited photo uploads or cloud storage, they usually come at a cost. I understand why some aspects might be subscription-based, such as receiving a substantial amount of cloud storage. Nevertheless, these subscriptions can feel like ways for companies to generate recurring revenue from a product made so cheaply that profit cannot be made from the frame itself. I encourage you to ensure that your chosen frame doesn’t require a subscription (neither of the frames I recommend in this guide have subscription-based features), especially if you’re planning to give this device as a gift.
How Much Should You Spend on a Digital Picture Frame?
For a frame with a nine- or ten-inch screen display, be prepared to spend at least $100. My budget recommendation is $99, and none of the cheaper options I tested were commendable. Spending $150 to $180 provides a significantly better experience in every respect, from functionality to design to screen quality.
Best Digital Picture Frames for 2025
Using an Aura frame felt like the company looked at the existing digital photo frame market and said “we have to be able to do better than this.” And they have. The Carver Mat is extremely simple to set up, has a wonderful screen, feels well-constructed and inoffensive and has some smart features that elevate it beyond its competitors (most of which don’t actually cost that much less).
The Carver Mat reminds me a little bit of an Amazon Echo Show in its design. It’s a landscape-oriented device with a wide, angled base that tapers to a thin edge at the top. Because of this design, you can’t orient it in portrait mode, like some other frames I tried, but Aura has a software trick to get around that (more on that in a minute). The whole device is made of a matte plastic in either black or white that has a nice grip, doesn’t show fingerprints and just overall feels like an old-school photo frame.
The 10.1-inch display is the best I’ve seen on any digital photo frame I’ve tested. Yes, the 1,280 x 800 resolution is quite low by modern standards, but it provides enough detail that all of my photos look crisp and clear. Beyond the resolution, the Carver’s screen has great color reproduction and viewing angles, and deals well with glare from the sun and lights alike. It’s not a touchscreen, but that doesn’t bother me because it prevents the screen from getting covered in fingerprints — and the app takes care of everything you need so it’s not required.
One control you will find on the frame is a way to skip forwards or backwards through the images loaded on it. You do this by swiping left or right on the top of the frame; you can also double-tap this area to “love” an image. From what I can tell, there’s no real utility in this aside from notifying the person who uploaded that pic that someone else appreciated it. But the swipe backwards and forwards gestures are definitely handy if you want to skip a picture or scroll back and see something you missed.
Setting the frame up was extremely simple. Once plugged in, I just downloaded the Aura app, made an account and tapped “add frame.” From there, it asked if the frame was for me or if I was setting it up as a gift (this mode lets you pre-load images so the device is ready to go as soon as someone plugs it in). Adding images is as simple as selecting things from your phone’s photo library. I could see my iPhone camera roll and any albums I had created in my iCloud Photos library, including shared albums that other people contribute to. You can also connect your Google Photos account and use albums from there.
One of the smartest features Aura offers is a continuous scan of those albums — so if you have one of your kids or pets and regularly add new images to it, they’ll show up on your frame without you needing to do anything. Of course, this has the potential for misuse. If you have a shared album with someone and you assign it to your Aura frame, any pictures that someone else adds will get shared to your frame, something you may not actually want. Just something to keep in mind.
My only main caveat for the Carver Mat, and Aura in general, is that an internet connection is required and the only way to get photos on the device is via the cloud. There’s a limited selection of photos downloaded to the device, but the user has no control over that, and everything else is pulled in from the cloud. Aura says there are no limits on how many images you can add, so you don’t need to worry about running out of storage. But if you don’t want yet another device that needs to be online all the time, Aura might not be for you. Most other frames I tested let you directly load photos via an SD card or an app.
The Aura app also lets you manage settings on the frame like how often it switches images (anywhere from every 30 seconds to every 24 hours, with lots of granular choices in between) or what order to display photos (chronologically or shuffled). There’s also a “photo match” feature, which intelligently handles the issue of having lots of images in both portrait and landscape orientation. Since the Carver Mat is designed to be used in landscape, the photo match feature makes it so portrait pictures are displayed side-by-side, with two images filling the frame instead of having black bars on either side. It also tries to pull together complementary pairs of images, like displaying the same person or pulling together two pics that were shot around the same time.
Overall, the Carver Mat checks all the boxes. Great screen, simple but classy design, a good app, no subscription required. Yes, it’s a little more expensive than some competing options, but all the cheaper options are also noticeably worse in a number of ways. And if you don’t want a mat, there’s a standard Carver that costs $149 and otherwise has the same features and specs as the Caver Mat I tested.
- High-quality display with minimal reflections
- App makes set-up and management of your photos simple
- You can store an unlimited number of pictures in Aura’s cloud
- Good integration with Apple iCloud Photos and Google Photos
- Elegant, well-constructed design
- Smartly displays two portrait photos side-by-side on the landscape display
- No subscription required
- A little pricey
- Aura’s app and cloud are the only way to get photos on the frame
- Can’t be set up in portrait orientation
If you’re looking to spend less, PhotoSpring’s Classic Digital Frame is the best option I’ve seen that costs less than $100 (just barely at $99). The PhotoSpring model comes with a 10.1-inch touchscreen with the same 1,280 x 800 resolution as the Carver Mat. The screen is definitely not as good as the Carver, though, with worse viewing angles and a lot more glare from light sources. That said, images still look sharp and colorful, especially considering you’re not going to be continuously looking at this display.
PhotoSpring’s frames are basically Android tablets with some custom software to make them work as single-purpose photo devices. That means you’ll use the touchscreen to dig into settings, flip through photos and otherwise manipulate the device. Changing things like how often the frame changes images can’t be done in the app. While doing things on the frame itself are fine, I prefer Aura’s system of managing everything on the app.
However, PhotoSpring does have a good advantage here: you can pop in a microSD card or USB drive to transfer images directly to the frame, no internet connection required. You can also use the PhotoSpring app to sync albums and single images as well, which obviously requires the internet. But once those pics have been transferred, you’re good to go. Additionally, you can upload pictures on a computer via the PhotoSpring website or sync Google Photos albums.
As for the PhotoSpring hardware itself, it looks good from the front, giving off traditional photo frame vibes. The back is rather plasticky and doesn’t feel very premium, but overall it’s fine for the price. There’s an adjustable stand so you can set the frame up in portrait or landscape mode, and you can set the software to crop your photos or just display them with borders if the orientation doesn’t fit.
PhotoSpring also has a somewhat unusual offering: a frame that has a rechargeable battery. The $99 model just uses AC power, but a $139 option lets you unplug the frame and pass it around to people so they can swipe through your photos albums on the device. This feels like a niche use case, and I think most people will be better served saving their $40, but it’s something to consider.
One of my favorite things about PhotoSpring is that they don’t nickel-and-dime you with subscription services. There aren’t any limits on how many images you can sync, nor are things like Google Photos locked behind a paywall. The combo of a solid feature set, a fine display and a low entry price point make the PhotoSpring a good option if you want to save some cash.
- Solid display
- Works in portrait or landscape orientation
- Lets you load pictures from multiple sources, including the PhotoSpring app, an SD card, USB drive or via Google Photos
- Inoffensive design
- No subscription required
- Touchscreen controls mean the display is prone to picking up fingerprints
- Display picks up more reflections than the Aura
- Feels a little cheap
- Software isn’t the most refined
If you want a device that works great as a digital photo frame that can do a lot more than the above options, consider Google’s Nest Hub Max. It has a 10-inch touchscreen with a 1,280 x 800 resolution and can connect to a host of Google services and other apps to help you control your smart home devices. It also works great for playing videos from YouTube or other services, or streaming music thanks to its large built-in speaker. At $229, it’s significantly more expensive than our other options, but there’s no question it can do a lot more.
From a photos perspective, you’ll need to use Google Photos. If you’re not already using the app, switching your library over might be too much of a task to make it worthwhile. But if you do use Google Photos, signing in with your Google account when you set up the Hub Max makes accessing your images quite simple. You can pick specific albums, have it stream your entire library or pull things from various recommendations it offers up.
Once that’s set up, you can customize the slideshow as you’d expect — I set mine to come up by default after the Hub Max was dormant for a few minutes. I also removed everything from the display except the photos. By default, it shows you a clock and the weather forecast, but I wanted to just focus on the pictures. I do like the option to show a little more info, though.
As for the screen itself, it has the same relatively low resolution of the other digital photo frames I tried, but it handles glare very well. And the built-in ambient light sensor automatically adjusts brightness and color temperature, which I enjoy. It keeps the Hub Max from feeling like an overly bright screen blasting you with light; it recedes into the background well.
Of course, the Nest Hub Max has a lot of voice-activated tricks via the Google Assistant. My big question is how long the Hub Max will be supported, as Google is clearly planning to phase out the Assistant in favor of Gemini, and I’m not convinced that the Hub Max will ever support that new AI-powered tool. Beyond the Assistant, you can get a variety of apps on it like Netflix and YouTube, stream music from a bunch of apps, see video from your Nest Cam or make video calls via the built-in camera.
If you’re going to buy a Nest Hub Max, it shouldn’t be just for its digital photo frame features, even though those are quite solid. It’s best for someone well-entrenched in the Google ecosystem who wants a more multi-purpose device. If you fit the bill, though, the Nest Hub Max remains a capable device, even though it’s been around for almost five years.
- Good display quality with auto-brightness and warmth settings
- Getting images on it is a piece of cake, provided you use Google Photos
- Plenty of ways to control smart home devices
- Good-sounding speaker
- Almost five years old
- Google Assistant’s days are likely numbered
- More expensive than a standard digital photo frame